#sports activities West Ham and Newcastle left FURIOUS after both clubs had goals disallowed by VAR today
West Ham and Newcastle had been both left fuming following a day of Premier League VAR controversy.
Raging David Moyes confronted referee Andrew Madley at full time and let rip in officers’ room too after he overturned his preliminary resolution to permit West Ham’s ninetieth minute equaliser at Chelsea to face, branding the U-turn ‘a ridiculously bad decision’ and accusing Edouard Mendy of faking damage to get the objective chalked off.
Captain Declan Rice labelled the choice ‘one of the worst VAR decisions’ since its introduction to the Premier League.
David Moyes confronted officers after West Ham had been denied a late equaliser towards Chelsea
Meanwhile Eddie Howe claimed Newcastle had been robbed of a respectable objective towards Crystal Palace after a call by referee Michael Salisbury that was branded ‘pathetic’ by membership legend Alan Shearer.
At Stamford Bridge, West Ham thought they had levelled when Maxwel Cornet fired in after the ball ran unfastened following a collision between Chelsea goalkeeper Edouard Mendy and Jarrod Bowen.
Bowen challenged for a mis-placed Reece James header as Mendy flew out, missed the Blues stopper together with his main foot however caught him together with his trailing foot earlier than Cornet scored.
At first Madley gave the objective however modified his thoughts after being instructed to assessment the incident pitchside.
Referee Andy Madley disallowed West Ham’s late objective at Stamford Bridge after consulting VAR
Moyes mentioned: ‘The goalkeeper comes to take it and actually fumbles out of his hands. And he could never recover it. Then he acts as if he has got a shoulder injury. The goalkeeper tries to fake an injury on the first goal as well.
‘I am amazed VAR sent the referee to have a look at it. Because I had a quick look at it at the side. Once I saw it I thought even if he goes to the TV there is no way he is overturning this because this is a goal. It was a ridiculously bad decision.
‘There is no excuse for that not to be a goal. None at all. Sadly this is the level of our elite refereeing at the moment.
Hammers captain Declan Rice referred to as the choice to overturn the objective ‘one of many worst VAR selections made because it’s come into the sport’
‘Jarrod said he never touched the goalkeeper at all and if you look at it, he jumps and he straddles him, and if there was anything there might have been a slight trailing foot, if there was anything at all. The goalkeeper had already mishandled the ball and dropped the ball and it came off him four, five, six yards where he couldn’t get better it.”
‘I’ve misplaced religion within the individuals placing it up for VAR. After watching it I can’t see how the objective was not given.’
Witnesses claimed Moyes aimed expletives at Madley as he vented his fury on the resolution within the referee’s room.
Moyes added: ‘I didn’t need a proof from them as a result of it might have been a troublesome one to present wouldn’t it. My goodness I don’t assume anyone may justify that. Even the referee couldn’t.’
Rice mentioned on Twitter: ‘That’s up there with one of many worst VAR selections made because it’s come into the sport. Shambles.’
Chelsea head coach Thomas Tuchel mentioned: ‘There is a reason I think it went in our favour. It’s my opinion and I don’t know if everybody shares the opinion that it’s very clear it’s a foul.’
At St James’s Park, Newcastle appeared like they had taken the lead by way of a Tyrick Mitchell personal objective within the 51st minute of yesterday’s stalemate at St James’ Park.
Newcastle thought they had taken the lead by way of a Tyrick Mitchell personal objective towards Crystal Palace
But Salisbury chalked off the objective after consulting his pitchside monitor, adjudging Newcastle midfielder Joe Willock to have pushed Palace goalkeeper Vicente Guaita earlier than the ball went in off Mitchell.
Howe, although, felt that the preliminary foul got here from Mitchell on Willock, claiming his participant was nudged off steadiness and that induced him to by chance ground Guaita.
‘I didn’t assume it ought to have been disallowed, personally,’ mentioned the Newcastle supervisor, whose aspect are actually winless in 5 video games.
But VAR overturned the objective, claiming that Newcastle midfielder Joe Willock had pushed the Palace goalkeeper within the buildup
Magpies boss Eddie Howe expressed his disappointment with the choice to disallow his aspect’s objective
‘I thought it was a foul or a push on Joe Willock in the build-up to the ball coming in. Joe’s momentum is fastened at that time from his opponent, it then carries him into the goalkeeper.
‘Without that push, there is no way Joe would have gone in with that force. For me, it’s not a foul. If something, it’s a penalty if it’s not a objective. I used to be very shocked with the end result.’
Newcastle icon Shearer tweeted: ‘Willock (was) clearly pushed into the keeper. Pathetic decision.’
However, Palace boss Patrick Vieira believes the officers referred to as it proper. ‘After looking at the images after the game, I thought that was the right decision from the referee,’ mentioned the Frenchman.