#UK Doctor who stole luxury goods from Harvey Nichols and Harrods is suspended for one year #UKnews

#UK Doctor who stole luxury goods from Harvey Nichols and Harrods is suspended for one year #UKnews

#UK Doctor who stole luxury goods from Harvey Nichols and Harrods is suspended for one year #UKnews

Table of Contents

Doctor who stole denims and sun shades from Harvey Nichols and a purse from Harrods is suspended for one year

 A hospital physician has been suspended after she was caught stealing denims and sun shades from luxury division retailer Harvey Nichols and a purse from Harrods.

Dr Sunita Sharma was arrested after safety employees at Harvey Nichols in London’s Knightbridge discovered she had used scissors to chop safety tags from the objects in a altering room earlier than attempting to stroll out with them. 

She failed to tell the General Medical Council of the crimes, which occurred in 2008, leding to the 12 month suspension.

A medical disciplinary listening to was informed she didn’t report her prison file – with it solely being uncovered after she was later convicted of theft following a separate incident at a Lakeland retailer in Handforth, Cheshire.

The later incident occured as she was working as a junior scientific fellow at Manchester Royal Infirmary in September 2018.

Dr Sharma was hauled into court docket for stealing quite a few objects from the shop – together with a microwave jug and journey luggage.

Although she pleaded not responsible, she was convicted of theft at Stockport Magistrates Court in May 2019, fined £286 and ordered to reimburse Lakeland for the price of the objects which was £104.18.

When she did report this matter to the General Medical Council, they found the earlier offences and warning in 2008.

Security staff at Harvey Nichols in London’s Knightbridge found she had used scissors to cut security tags from the items in a changing room before trying to walk out with them

Security employees at Harvey Nichols in London’s Knightbridge discovered she had used scissors to chop safety tags from the objects in a altering room earlier than attempting to stroll out with them

The disciplinary listening to was informed: ‘Information was obtained concerning the Metropolitan Police incident which occurred in June 2008.

‘Dr Sharma had used a pair of scissors to help with eradicating tags from the objects she had stolen, which was the substance of the ‘going outfitted for theft’ allegation.

‘Dr Sharma was seen by safety employees at Harvey Nichols in Knightsbridge, London, at round 4pm exiting a altering room inside the retailer.

‘Security officers checked the cubicle and discovered quite a few safety digital tags inside a pair of denims that had been left in thecubicle which have been the identical as these the shop used.

‘There have been additionally quite a few ticket value labels on the ground and quite a few different objects discovered discarded in the identical pair of denims, together with a pair of sun shades.”

The tribunal dominated that failing to report the police warning to the GMC, as she was obliged to do, amounted to misconduct.

Discussing the thefts, the tribunal famous: ‘These weren’t spur of the second and these acts wanted some planning.

‘In relation to the incident in 2008, Dr Sharma had taken scissors and used them to take away tags, in 2018 she had together with her a big bag to secrete these objects to be taken from the store. The Tribunal discovered that these have been critical issues.’

She was also found guilty of the theft of a handbag from Harrods earlier that day

She was additionally discovered responsible of the theft of a purse from Harrods earlier that day

Although she pleaded not guilty, she was convicted of theft at Stockport Magistrates Court in May 2019, fined £286 and ordered to reimburse Lakeland for the cost of the items which was £104.18.

Although she pleaded not responsible, she was convicted of theft at Stockport Magistrates Court in May 2019, fined £286 and ordered to reimburse Lakeland for the price of the objects which was £104.18.

Dr Sharma, who certified in Rajasthan, India, earlier than coming to Britain on the age of 30 informed the listening to she had been below private stress.

She mentioned she had come from a really ‘well to do’ household in India and that her family members have been educated to PhD stage and have been extremely profitable of their careers.

She informed the tribunal of the excessive expectations that they had for her to realize one thing ‘big’ in life and that she had made ‘massive’ sacrifices to develop into a health care provider.

The tribunal famous: ‘Dr Sharma has demonstrated acceptance and duty for her offending. She has additionally expressed an apology, remorse, regret and disgrace for her offending and that she understands the gravity of it.’

Suspending her for 12 months, the tribunal dominated: ‘After rigorously balancing all of the elements, the Tribunal was happy {that a} interval of suspension was the suitable and proportionate sanction on this case.’

It added that Dr Sharma’s actions, ‘whilst serious, were not fundamentally incompatible with continued registration’.

Leave a Comment

adplus-dvertising