#USA What was Queen Elizabeth REALLY like? GYLES BRANDRETH answers the question everyone wants to know  #USNews

#USA What was Queen Elizabeth REALLY like? GYLES BRANDRETH answers the question everyone wants to know  #USNews

#USA What was Queen Elizabeth REALLY like? GYLES BRANDRETH answers the question everyone wants to know  #USNews

Because I’ve met her — as a result of, at shut quarters, I’ve noticed her as she carried out a spread of her official duties — individuals usually ask me, leaning ahead, narrowing their eyes: ‘What was the Queen actually like?’

My reply disappoints them. ‘Very good,’ I say. ‘Rather regular, truly; fairly easy; a lot as you’d anticipate.’

I ponder if we respect how lucky we now have been. Elizabeth II was neither eccentric nor quixotic, and her husband was as trustworthy and simple as the day is lengthy.

If there’s one phrase that sums up Elizabeth II, it’s ‘dutiful’. Her life was pushed by responsibility. She was a dutiful daughter and a dutiful Queen.

As Princess Elizabeth, aged 21, she stated: ‘I declare earlier than you all that my entire life, whether or not or not it’s lengthy or brief, shall be devoted to your service.’ She meant it. At her Coronation, she made a dedication to God in addition to to her individuals, and her religion sustained her in all she did.

Because I have met her — because, at close quarters, I have observed her as she carried out a range of her official duties — people often ask me, leaning forward, narrowing their eyes: 'What was the Queen really like?' Queen Elizabeth II is pictured in 2015 at the Royal Windsor Horse Show

Because I’ve met her — as a result of, at shut quarters, I’ve noticed her as she carried out a spread of her official duties — individuals usually ask me, leaning ahead, narrowing their eyes: ‘What was the Queen actually like?’ Queen Elizabeth II is pictured in 2015 at the Royal Windsor Horse Show

From an early age, she knew what lay forward: a relentless, endlessly repetitive rollercoaster trip of royal duties and good works, from which solely demise or revolution may launch her.

She by no means abdicated, not — as some commentators steered — as a result of she did not need to see her son develop into King, however as a result of her religion, sense of responsibility and heritage meant abdication was merely not a risk. 

Her Uncle David abdicated and his was not an instance she wished to observe. ‘It’s a job for all times,’ she stated. ‘It’s a question of maturing into one thing one has received used to doing and accepting that it is your destiny, as a result of I feel continuity is essential.’

It shouldn’t be actually shocking that her demise touches us in the approach it does. Along with members of her household, she featured in our newspapers and on our TV screens virtually day by day.

Yet our relationship with royalty is neither fleeting nor superficial. The Queen is on our postage stamps, cash and banknotes. She is greater than head of state: she is at the coronary heart of our nationwide identification — and for a purpose.

During her exceptionally lengthy reign, Elizabeth II was dwelling historical past. Her godparents included each her grandfather King George V and Arthur, Duke of Connaught, the final surviving son of Queen Victoria.

I wonder if we appreciate how fortunate we have been. Elizabeth II was neither eccentric nor quixotic, and her husband was as honest and straightforward as the day is long

I ponder if we respect how lucky we now have been. Elizabeth II was neither eccentric nor quixotic, and her husband was as trustworthy and simple as the day is lengthy

As the newest in a line of sovereigns that linked her immediately to King Edgar, Richard III, Henry VIII, George IV and Queen Victoria, she was the embodiment of our nation’s story. Her presence linked us to our previous.

She completely understood her function, her duties and the inevitable restrictions that these imposed. But the Queen’s life was additionally certainly one of privilege. She had met everyone and been in all places. She had by no means wished for something. Wherever she went, she was cosseted. And the corgis got here, too — flown, if want be, in an Andover plane of the Queen’s Flight.

Her days have been generally lengthy and infrequently arduous, however she had workers ever in attendance and the consolation of a routine that hardly ever various.

At 8am, Her Majesty’s dresser entered the royal bed room with the ‘calling tray’ and a pot of Earl Grey tea. The curtains have been drawn, the bathtub was run (to a depth of seven inches and a temperature of 72f — examined by thermometer) and the Palace started to stir (no vacuuming was permitted earlier than 8am).

Her garments have been laid out for her, her hairdresser was at hand. At 9am, as her private piper performed beneath her home windows, the Queen walked from her bed room, by means of her sitting room to her eating room, holding her Roberts radio, listening to the information of the day.

Breakfast was modest: cereal (from these Tupperware containers), a slice of granary toast, a layer of Oxford marmalade. At ten o’clock the enterprise of the day started: her non-public secretary appeared; correspondence was thought-about, state papers scanned; if it was a morning for receiving ambassadors or the day of an investiture, Her Majesty studied her briefing materials.

At one o’clock, earlier than a lightweight lunch (she wasn’t fussy about her meals), she handled herself — till her 96th yr, when she gave up alcohol on the recommendation of her docs — to a gin and Dubonnet: equal measures, two lumps of ice and a slice of lemon (the lemon was sliced for her).

At 2.30pm, she walked the corgis. At 5, she took tea. At six, the drinks tray reappeared and Her Majesty may enable herself a reasonable gin and tonic. At 8.15pm, it was time for supper.

From an early age, she knew what lay ahead: a relentless, endlessly repetitive rollercoaster ride of royal duties and good works, from which only death or revolution could release her (The Queen is pictured in 2018)

From an early age, she knew what lay forward: a relentless, endlessly repetitive rollercoaster trip of royal duties and good works, from which solely demise or revolution may launch her (The Queen is pictured in 2018) 

On some days, the Queen and Prince Philip would share all or a few of their meals — however not at all daily. Their pursuits and commitments usually took them in several instructions.

Long earlier than Prince Philip’s demise, the Queen had grown accustomed to evenings on her personal. She watched tv, she accomplished crosswords, she gave the corgis their late supper. She telephoned her racing supervisor. She chatted along with her private web page.

I can let you know precisely what the Queen was like. She had the pursuits, attributes and tastes of an English (or Scottish) countrywoman of her class and technology. Dogs and horses, courtesy, kindliness and neighborhood service counted along with her.

According to Sonia Berry, maybe her closest childhood buddy: ‘She would by no means have chosen to be Queen. She would a lot quite have lived in the nation with horses and canine and been a traditional housewife.’

In 1956, Nikita Khrushchev, General Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party, braced himself for ‘haughtiness’ when he took tea with the Queen at Windsor Castle. To his shock, he discovered her ‘fully unpretentious — the form of girl you’ll be doubtless to meet strolling alongside Gorky Street on a balmy summer time afternoon’.

Essentially conservative (with radical thrives), clever (not mental), pragmatic (not introspective), ‘immensely tolerant’ (Prince Philip’s phrase), even-tempered and completely dependable, the Queen made no pretence of being what she was not.

Although formally apolitical, she was undoubtedly not politically right. If she selected, she would exit driving and not using a onerous hat. She would put on fur, she would not use a seat belt and in her assorted residences, cigarettes have been freely obtainable to her company.

I can tell you exactly what the Queen was like. She had the interests, attributes and tastes of an English (or Scottish) countrywoman of her class and generation

I can let you know precisely what the Queen was like. She had the pursuits, attributes and tastes of an English (or Scottish) countrywoman of her class and technology

I’m advised she even smoked one herself from time to time. Can that be true? If it’s, it made her extra understanding of her daughter-in-law Camilla’s weak point for the weed.

It was no accident that her son Charles’s second spouse turned out to be very a lot the Queen’s form of girl — way more so than Diana may ever have been. Camilla can speak simply (and amusingly) about canine and horses. 

She is comfy with the Queen’s view of life (for the most half, she shares it); she is politically incorrect (in a great way), humorous, self-deprecating, life like and, like the Queen, she is a mom and grandmother who has been a bit tempest-tossed however has managed to climate the storms.

Was the Queen a prude? By no means. As you may anticipate, she was averse to unhealthy language, however — as I witnessed myself in the 40 years I knew Prince Philip — her husband often used four-letter phrases. The Queen merely put up along with his salty language.

When Lech Walesa was President of Poland and got here to keep, she advised an aide: ‘He solely is aware of two English phrases.’ She paused, earlier than including: ‘They are fairly attention-grabbing phrases.’ More just lately, at an artwork gallery, she was confronted by a sequence of Lucian Freud nudes: heavy, spreading bosoms, weighty, blue-veined thighs. Sensing that the photographers current have been keen to get a shot of her gazing up at certainly one of them, Her Majesty moved herself adroitly out of vary.

When her host inquired, ‘Haven’t you been painted by Lucian Freud, Ma’am?’, she smiled and stated, sotto voce: ‘Yes, however not like that.’

Famously, the Queen was a skilful mimic — not a lot of people however of accents, be it Cockney or Norfolk — and she or he had a vigorous, even impish, sense of humour.

Always on the cellphone to her ‘extravagant’ mum 

Was the Queen Mother jealous of her elder daughter? The Queen’s former non-public secretary, Martin Charteris, believed she was.

‘Queen Elizabeth was not but 52 when the King died,’ he jogged my memory. ‘She was accustomed to being centre stage, the focus of consideration, universally beloved. She was nonetheless beloved, in fact, and admired, however she was not the star of the present and I do not suppose she discovered that straightforward.

‘In the early days of the new Queen’s reign, there was an awkwardness about priority, with the Queen not wanting to go in entrance of her mom and Queen Elizabeth, in fact, accustomed to going first.’

Even so, Elizabeth II had a great relationship along with her mom — ‘loving and regular’ is how the Queen’s cousin Margaret Rhodes described it to me.

The Queen did often shake her head when considering her mom’s insouciant extravagance. At the time of her demise, Queen Elizabeth’s overdraft at Coutts was reported to be in the area of £4 million.

She was supposed to have as soon as stated at a cocktail party: ‘Golly, I may do with £100,000, could not you? Had such an terrible afternoon at this time with my financial institution supervisor scolding me about my overdraft.’

And sure, the Queen may, once in a while, categorical envy of her mom’s extraordinary capability for avoiding all unpleasantness. But mom and daughter have been good pals, on the similar wavelength, with mutual pursuits (particularly horses) and comfy in one another’s firm, every wanting ahead to their common, straightforward, uncomplicated chats on the phone.

Prince Philip stated to me as soon as, eyebrows raised in amazement: ‘They’re all the time on the cellphone!’

We all know that: we gasped in amazement when she appeared on movie with Daniel Craig’s James Bond as a part of the opening ceremony of the London Olympics in 2012. She was amused to be requested; she was blissful to do it; she performed her half with out fuss and in only one take; she loved the shock on the evening — she had not confided to her household that she was making this distinctive contribution to the Olympic celebrations.

Given the weirdness of her life (imprisoned by her destiny; destined to be Queen from the age of ten), the Queen appeared to me to be fairly remarkably nicely balanced, rounded, grounded and relaxed with herself, the world and her place in it.

Friends who knew her when she was youthful inform tales of her sitting on the couch after dinner, her toes tucked up beneath her, chatting late into the evening. People (even those that knew her nicely) nonetheless discovered it troublesome to deal with her usually, however she behaved usually nonetheless.

Once she arrived just a little late for a supper at a non-public home in Belgravia. ‘Cooee,’ she referred to as up the stairwell as she was taking off her coat, ‘it is us. Sorry we’re late. Terrible visitors.’

This important normality — mixed with elementary decency — was all the time there, beneath the royal trappings.

From all the individuals I’ve spoken with who have been shut to the Queen — courtiers, family and friends members — I get the impression that she was not judgmental when it got here to others. She seemed for the finest in individuals and hoped for the finest from them and for them.

When issues went mistaken, she prayed (on her knees, along with her arms folded collectively) that they might go higher. But though she was Queen, she didn’t lay down the regulation. She was, for example, all the time reluctant to intrude in the non-public lives of members of her household.

There was a streak of hysteria in Diana, Princess of Wales: you sensed it even with a quick acquaintance. There was none in the Queen. The Queen was sane. The Queen was smart. She had her toes on the floor.

Unlike Prince Philip, who would often fly right into a rage, she was all the time calm. According to her buddy Sonia Berry: ‘She may get aggravated about one thing however as a rule she stayed on a fair keel. I by no means noticed her lose her mood.’

Nor was the Queen self-conscious: she would apply her lipstick whoever was watching. She was not simply flustered: nevertheless hectic the schedule, nevertheless many stops on the tour, her personal regular tempo by no means various.

Of course, she had senior courtiers round her who knew what they have been doing (unstuffy, for the most half; unfussy, with a few exceptions), and dependable ladies-in-waiting who have been actual pals.

For 67 years of devoted service, she additionally had her dresser and confidante Bobo MacDonald (the Queen got here down from Balmoral to the Chapel Royal at St James’s Palace for her funeral). Bobo was succeeded by one other dresser, Angela Kelly (a Liverpool dock employee’s daughter, 25 years youthful than the Queen), who turned an ally and buddy.

Inevitably, given the size of her reign, the Queen had her ups and downs. In 1957, a 33-year-old peer, author and historian, the 2nd Lord Altrincham, turned internationally infamous in a single day for publishing what many thought to be an unforgivable private assault on the Queen.

Altrincham accused the Queen, then 31, of being out of contact, dwelling completely inside the confines of her personal class, surrounded by courtiers of ‘the tweedy type’, making speeches that amounted to ‘prim little sermons’ in the method of ‘a priggish schoolgirl’ and talking with a voice that was ‘a ache in the neck’.

‘Like her mom,’ wrote Altrincham, the younger Queen ‘seems to be unable to string even a number of sentences collectively and not using a written textual content.’

#USA What was Queen Elizabeth REALLY like? GYLES BRANDRETH answers the question everyone wants to know  #USNews

The Queen waits in the Drawing Room earlier than receiving Liz Truss for an viewers at Balmoral, Scotland on Tuesday. Today she is beneath the supervision of docs amid issues about her well being

He went on: ‘When she has misplaced the bloom of youth, the Queen’s popularity will rely, way over it does now, upon her character. It is not going to then be sufficient for her to undergo the motions; she may have to say issues which individuals can bear in mind and do issues on her personal initiative which can make individuals sit up and take discover. As but there’s little signal that such a character is rising.’

More than 60 years on, the Queen’s popularity does certainly relaxation upon her character. With a handful of exceptions, she didn’t say issues which individuals may bear in mind, or do issues which made individuals sit up and take discover. But her character emerged nonetheless.

We know what the Queen stood for and cared about. Take, for instance, her dogged dedication to the Commonwealth. Whitehall and Westminster could also be extra preoccupied with the United Kingdom’s relations with Europe and the United States, however the Queen’s educated enthusiasm for what she described as ‘a free and voluntary affiliation of equal companions’ that ‘in all historical past has no precedent’ was a surprise to behold.

The novelist Daphne du Maurier, when her husband Boy Browning was nonetheless Comptroller of the Duke of Edinburgh’s family, stayed at Balmoral and was struck by the approach Prince Philip may discuss something — literature, artwork, homicide, navy manoeuvres — whereas the Queen’s vary of pursuits and dialog was way more restricted.

Her ‘snapping’ at Philip over intruder 

In July 1982, an intruder — a 33-year-old schizophrenic named Michael Fagan — discovered his approach into Buckingham Palace and disturbed the Queen, alone, asleep in mattress.

This alarming incident prompted a double dose of concern from components of the Press: why was the Palace’s safety so lamentable and the place was Prince Philip? Why was he not readily available to come to his spouse’s rescue?

Indeed, the ‘revelation’ that the Queen and her husband didn’t seem to share a bed room prompted extra remark in sure quarters than the truth {that a} lunatic may wander away the road and into the sovereign’s bed room with out let or hindrance.

The Queen, who, at the time, dealt with the intrusion with commendable calm, was however shaken. The standard Press had the reply: ‘Give her a cuddle, Philip,’ instructed one headline.

In truth, when sleeping beneath the similar roof, the Queen and Prince Philip often did share the similar mattress. It simply occurred that on the morning of Fagan’s intrusion, Philip had a crack-of-dawn begin for an out-of-town official engagement and so spent the evening in his personal quarters.

Their long-standing buddy Gina Kennard advised me: ‘At Balmoral that year — after that man got into her bedroom — the Queen began snapping at Philip. She was really quite snappy with him. Which was unusual for her. Not for him, of course. He’s all the time been a bit snappy. But the man entering into her room was horrid.’

It was. The man had a damaged glass ashtray in his hand and was bleeding when he entered the Queen’s bed room at round 7.15am.

She pressed the alarm button by her mattress, however her in a single day police guard had gone off responsibility at 6am and her footman was strolling the corgis. Fagan merely wandered in, drew the curtains and sat on the mattress.

He wished to share his troubles with Her Majesty. (Later, he advised police he had deliberate to slash his wrists in entrance of the Queen.) Eventually, when he requested for a cigarette, the Queen managed to manoeuvre him out of the bed room and the alarm was raised.

The incident prompted a assessment of Palace safety, which was, in the phrases of Fagan himself, ‘diabolical’. This was not Fagan’s first daybreak raid on the Palace: on the earlier event he had stolen a bottle of wine.

The then Home Secretary Willie Whitelaw, who was in the end liable for the Queen’s safety, provided his resignation. It was declined. Some years later, he advised me, his eyes brimming with tears: ‘I felt utterly ashamed, utterly miserable. It was the worst moment of my public life.’

Michael Fagan, the 33-year-old intruder into Buckingham Palace in July 1982

Michael Fagan, the 33-year-old intruder into Buckingham Palace in July 1982

Her Majesty’s face solely actually ‘lit up’ when the speak was of horses — and world affairs.

In reality, the Queen was exceptionally nicely knowledgeable. This is as a result of she was conscientious. She did her ‘packing containers’ week in, week out, all through the yr. She stated she was a fast reader, ‘although I do quite begrudge a few of the hours that I’ve to do as an alternative of being outdoor’.

She knew the presidents and prime ministers of the Commonwealth personally. The approach they spoke of her — invariably with respect, usually with affection, often with awe — suggests their admiration was real, not merely a matter of type.

In the United Kingdom, she had 15 prime ministers. She maintained a cordial relationship with all of them — even Margaret Thatcher, who advised me that the speak of her having a strained relationship with the Queen was ‘numerous nonsense’.

‘The Queen,’ stated Lady Thatcher, ‘is solely marvellous. And her dedication to the Commonwealth and to our Armed Services has been particularly necessary.’

When Parliament was sitting, the Queen and prime minister met as soon as per week, and in September the prime minister and his/her consort have been briefly company of Her Majesty at Balmoral (it’s reckoned that the Blairs’ child Leo, born a tad prematurely on May 20, 2000, was conceived beneath the royal roof).

The Queen noticed herself as a ‘sounding board’ for her prime ministers.

She stated: ‘They unburden themselves, or inform me what is going on on. If they have any issues, generally one may also help in that approach, too. I feel it is quite good to really feel that one’s a form of sponge.

‘Some issues keep there and a few issues exit the different ear . . . often, one can put one’s viewpoint when maybe they hadn’t seen it from that angle.’

On the entire, the Queen accepted what politicians threw at her over the years, reminiscent of the curtailment of the Civil List and the requirement from 1993 to pay tax on her non-public earnings. There was negotiation — a little bit of give and tackle both facet — however in the end, the authorities of the day referred to as the pictures.

She did, nevertheless, efficiently resist an try by Tony Benn (when he was Postmaster-General in the mid Sixties) to have the Sovereign’s profile faraway from British postage stamps.

Once, I requested Lord Charteris, Her Majesty’s longest-serving non-public secretary, if the Queen herself ever felt she had put a foot mistaken. He stated, without delay: ‘Aberfan. She received that mistaken and she or he is aware of it.’

In October 1966, in the South Wales mining village of Aberfan, a slag heap collapsed, engulfing the village faculty and killing 146 individuals. The Queen expressed her anguish in a press launch and dispatched Prince Philip and Lord Snowdon to the scene. She didn’t instantly go herself.

‘It was a mistake,’ Charteris advised me, ‘and one she regrets. The scale of the tragedy referred to as for a right away response, however she shouldn’t be a spontaneous particular person and isn’t given to emotional gestures. Custom, type and precedent depend along with her. She tends to do what she has carried out earlier than.’

She made up for her error in the years that adopted. She visited Aberfan 4 occasions, most just lately throughout her Diamond Jubilee tour in 2012, when she unveiled a plaque at Ynysowen Community Primary School and made a speech. (She was ever-present and all the time extremely seen, however she didn’t make that many speeches.)

The Queen continues to be charged by some with having been out of contact and gradual to react (for instance, in the case of Paul Burrell’s trial and at the outset of the week of Diana’s demise) and even her keenest admirers, who regarded her as a drive for good, wouldn’t have described her as a drive for change.

But whereas that may have mattered when she was a youthful girl, it didn’t matter in any respect later in her reign. The world modified: the Queen, thank God, didn’t.

Amid life’s uncertainties, she was reassuringly acquainted. She saved the present on the highway.

She saved her profile on the postage stamps, not for causes of self-importance however as a result of that was the place it belonged; that was the place you anticipated it to be.

Adapted from Philip: The Final Portrait by Gyles Brandreth, printed by Coronet, £12.99. © 2022 Gyles Brandreth. To purchase a replica for £11.69 go to mailshop.co.uk/books or name 020 3176 2937. Offer legitimate till 24/9/2022, UK p&p is free on orders over £20.

Leave a Comment